Noise Stomach Lie Down

Since today is the bridge, but Curran, things are quiet and gives me time to take a virtual look at certain places that had long not frequent. And I find myself in a blog a question that catches my attention. Just put the first paragraph as follows beyond my understanding.

Is the threshold of our disorders "membership of uniqueness" in each one of us? Stunned

I stay because it is so difficult, but how hard is that I do not understand, answer that question I'm blank at the screen. Can the singularity be membership? ... I think not, in the sense that I understand the membership. Perhaps the correct question should be: Is the threshold of our disorder to be unique?.

can not belong to something so that something unique when is plural, and membership is. Being single, I mean human beings (also true for the rest of the animal, vegetable and mineral) is to have a particularity, a distinction, a separation of the ordinary, "something" ultimately makes us different to any other. (Seen and almost everything would be unique ... but not because there are constant or not own rules and is what makes us unique. For example, the famous monkey above).
membership
And what is it?. Let us say "The sense of belonging means attachment to something that is considered important, like people, things, groups, organizations or institutions, which helps to remove or mitigate the solitude that today affects human conglomerates, promoting insensitivity, selfishness, distrust, and a progressive sense of insecurity and helplessness .... "

The singularity is a non-transferable personal property, maybe a feature of our genes can go perpetuating over time , that is something that belongs to us does not create ownership per se.

Belonging is the feeling of attachment to things that are related both culturally and ideologically. And that is something you choose.

Anyway I have to think a bit more about that in the "property" and "singularities".

I had the weekend to reflect, among other things like hanging out with friend l @ s @ s that have come, whom I have care and other necessities to take care of my own unique life. And I think that the use, or rather the misuse of words are adjectives or names, together more or less artistic to create confusion or bad sound, is an egocentric exercise where such use is made of how to love provide a veneer highbrow to our interventions.
words, that bunch of letters together and sundered, are like numbers and musical notes. Combinations are endless ... but we can go as a masterpiece as a colossal blunder, a melodious song or a terrible noise, a cluster of scribbles that do not understand nor see the same that created them.

To summarize: I'm single, I have uniqueness. I belong to the human race, I have earthly possessions (that is nothing and sometimes all) out of the ordinary. But I have no membership of singularity. Therein lies the crux of the issue: how to use the words.

Of course there will always be people who like it more as sounding dissonant and vice versa ... but that is also part of the uniqueness of each and everyone.